Wednesday, October 27, 2004
MLP: The Myth of the Kerry Calamity by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
The Myth of the Kerry Calamity by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.
Rockwell contrasts the guiding motives of Republicans and Democrats in the seats of power and finds sound reason for preferring a Democratic executive, of the two:
[Democrats] have the strongest interest in keeping government functioning well, which implies balancing the budget, cleaning house, stamping out corruption, maintaining some semblance of order and peace, not doing things that utterly discredit bureaucracies, finding fixes to make things work a bit better for themselves and their friends, etc. As the most direct owners of the state, they have the strongest interest in its health and well-being.
It's as though the Bush administration knows it has only at most a few more years to loot the world, and so it had better do it quick.
I wonder, in passing, if this rationale, though informed by knowledge of facts of history rather than social-science laws, may suggest anything about, first, the more rapid degeneration of Hitler's statee than of Stalin's, and second, the impulse often found among libertarians to defend the principle, not only moral but also economic, that the rightful owners of the state's property may reclaim it as though it were unappropriated. I wonder: and then I feel foolish.
Link
Rockwell contrasts the guiding motives of Republicans and Democrats in the seats of power and finds sound reason for preferring a Democratic executive, of the two:
[Democrats] have the strongest interest in keeping government functioning well, which implies balancing the budget, cleaning house, stamping out corruption, maintaining some semblance of order and peace, not doing things that utterly discredit bureaucracies, finding fixes to make things work a bit better for themselves and their friends, etc. As the most direct owners of the state, they have the strongest interest in its health and well-being.
It's as though the Bush administration knows it has only at most a few more years to loot the world, and so it had better do it quick.
I wonder, in passing, if this rationale, though informed by knowledge of facts of history rather than social-science laws, may suggest anything about, first, the more rapid degeneration of Hitler's statee than of Stalin's, and second, the impulse often found among libertarians to defend the principle, not only moral but also economic, that the rightful owners of the state's property may reclaim it as though it were unappropriated. I wonder: and then I feel foolish.
Comments:
Nice link. Damn, but that guy can write. "To love one's captors and appreciate their favors is a psychosis, but one that gains a mass following in the weeks before a presidential election."
Shrill: "But the Bush supporters don't say that. Instead they liken him to God. They consider him savior. They trust him with leadership. They really credit him with securing the country. They say that he is ruling in the name of liberty. It is remarkable, even demonic. The Bush regime isn't just a group of leaders vying for our affections. It is the world's leading example of the cult of power itself."
Damn.
Post a Comment
Shrill: "But the Bush supporters don't say that. Instead they liken him to God. They consider him savior. They trust him with leadership. They really credit him with securing the country. They say that he is ruling in the name of liberty. It is remarkable, even demonic. The Bush regime isn't just a group of leaders vying for our affections. It is the world's leading example of the cult of power itself."
Damn.
